In
class the other day we discussed what traits make a person intelligent. As of
now, intelligence is measured through intelligence quotient tests. These tests measure general knowledge,
memorization, basic math and vocabulary. It is believed that the higher a
person scores on these tests compared to others in their age group, the more
intelligent they are. In the field of Psychology, many experts have mixed
emotions about IQ tests.
One
example of these types of tests is the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Quotient Test.
Participant’s ages range from early childhood to early adulthood. This test is designed
to assess the level of cognitive ability in the participant. There are four
main components to the test and fifteen sub tests. In order to determine which
tests the taker will be administered, they must first take a vocabulary test. This
gives the test proctor an idea of what level of test will be suitable. Varying
amounts of these tests can be chosen and administered to the participants to
test specific areas of knowledge. When the test is finished, the scores are
calculated. The scores are then compared to the scores of others’ tests in the
same age group("Stanford Binet Intelligence Test").
Those
who are skeptics about IQ testing find many flaws about the tests. One flaw is
that because intelligence is an abstract idea and there is not one uniform
definition of what intelligence is. In research it is nearly impossible to find
make accurate conclusions when there are varying definitions of what is being
tested. People’s definition of intelligence is often based on their own opinion
on what makes a person intelligent. Another flaw skeptics find is that IQ tests
only measure a few subjects. They don’t take into account things such as the
participants environment and genetic predispositions.
In
my opinion, I think that intelligence is related to a persons achievements
compared to their potential. Everyone has different abilities that don’t
necessarily involve general knowledge or book smarts. I feel as though
intelligence should be assessed on an individual basis and there should not be
one test that is applied to a variety of people. Every person has a unique set
of potential and innate skills that they are born with. I don’t agree with the
idea that if a person has a low score on an IQ test notion that they are dumb.
I feel as though it is bias and inaccurate to compare a college graduate’s
intelligence with someone who has a GED or high school diploma.
I
don’t think that IQ tests are a bad idea I just feel as though they need to be
improved. I feel as though more subject matter should be added to these tests.
I think the test should consider a persons level of education, their culture
and biological and genetic influences as well. More components should be taken
into account when administering the test to make it more versatile. I also feel
as though more tests should be administered among people of varying backgrounds
in order to ensure their accuracy.
Nicole Gaspari
"Stanford Binet Intelligence Test." Kids IQ Test Center. N.p., n.d. Web. 30
Mar.
2012. <http://www.kids-iq-tests.com/
stanford-binet-intelligence-scale.htm>.
2012. <http://www.kids-iq-tests.com/
stanford-binet-intelligence-scale.htm>.
I agree that IQ tests need to be improved.
ReplyDelete~Liz L.