A lot of what Carr mentioned about Google in chapter eight
came as a surprise to me. It is quite obvious that Google’s founders are successful in their business, and maybe I
just do not think about technology as much as many people (such as Carr) do,
but I did not think about, nor did I ever realize how much the founders and
workers at Google invest into their company. Carr seems to put Google on an extremely, exaggeratedly
high pedestal, on which, in my opinion it really does not belong. With that
being said, the people at Google did deserve some recognition in Carr’s book,
for they did invent something that changed the internet. In my opinion, however,
the power of Google is not that it
controls our minds as Carr states, but rather, that it controls a lot of how
different websites on the internet work.
I
probably use Google at least once a
day, on average. However, that does not mean that I would fall apart without
it. To compare Google to a church, as
Carr does in chapter eight, is a far stretch from reality. Although Google has
helped me out a lot, I definitely could live without it, for there are plenty
of other sites, like the Yahoo search
bar, that do just as good of a job for me. Carr makes it seem as though Google is successful because no one can
seem to do what Google does, however,
this does not prove to be true to me. When I think of search engines, Google is probably the first one that
comes to mind, but that is not because, as Carr states, they run their site in
a way no one else does, but rather, they market their site in a way no one else
does. Google is essentially popular
for being known, and although there are plenty of other sites out there that do
essentially the same thing as Google,
they do not present themselves in the way that Google does, and that is what makes the site stand out from its
competition.
Never
would I have imagined that people were hired by Google to watch my every move on the site, see where I click (or
don’t click), see what I respond to the most, or time how long I spend on the
site. However, as Carr brings up, there are people that do just that, and that
is probably why Google has prospered
so much- they invest so much. With all of the money, time and energy spent on developing
every aspect of Google, I would hope
that it would be as popular as it is. The site makes it so that users are
attracted to it, and though their ideas, like that of AdWords are extremely
good ideas, they are not impossible to copy. Because of this, many sites are able
to do exactly what Google has done,
making them no better, or worse of a search engine. However, because Google was the first site to put the
ideas into action, it is obviously going to be a more popular site.
I too did not realize how much money Google made off of my searches using their website. It is incredible to think of. It also makes me want to use other Search Engines in order to stop giving Google such a monopoly over them.
ReplyDelete-Theresa Pallotta
Your right I could probably live without google and maybe use bing. However it would be an adjustment both sites pull up different results to make me question which one is truly better. which has probably aided in "The Church of Google."
ReplyDeleteKelsey Coughlin
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteGood post just I don't think Carr was literally comparing Google to a church I think he was just making an analogy, if Google were a church its religion would be Talorism. This just emphasizing the fact that they use maximum efficiency.
ReplyDelete-Clifford McKeon